Skip to main content

🩺 New CQC Potential Missed Diagnosis Indicators

Identifies patients whose blood test results suggest diabetes or chronic kidney disease but who may be missing a formal diagnosis code.

Updated over 3 weeks ago

We’ve added two new CQC Potential Missed Diagnosis indicators to help practices identify patients whose blood test results meet diagnostic criteria for diabetes or chronic kidney disease, but don’t yet have the correct diagnosis coded.

These indicators highlight patients who may need a formal diagnosis so they can be added to the right registers and receive appropriate monitoring and treatment.


πŸ” What’s new

These indicators look for:

  • Blood test results that meet clinical diagnostic thresholds

  • Patients who do not already have a valid diagnosis or explanation recorded

Important:
These are inverse indicators.

  • Complete = the patient does have a valid diagnosis or explanation

  • Not complete = the patient may need review and coding


1️⃣ CQC_MISDIAG_DM β€” Possible Missed Diabetes Diagnosis

Identifies patients whose HbA1c results indicate diabetes but who do not have a diabetes diagnosis coded.

What it checks

  • Two HbA1c results β‰₯48 mmol/mol

  • Results recorded within the last 2 years

  • Results taken more than 2 weeks apart

  • Whether the patient already has a valid diagnosis or explanation recorded

What counts as complete

A patient is considered complete if they have any of the following recorded after the diagnostic results:

  • A current diabetes diagnosis

  • A diabetes resolved code

  • Gestational diabetes recorded within 12 months

  • Steroid-induced diabetes recorded within 12 months

  • A haemoglobinopathy diagnosis (which affects HbA1c accuracy)

Patients without one of these will appear for review.

Why this matters

Uncoded diabetes means patients may miss:

  • Retinal screening and foot checks

  • Structured diabetes reviews

  • Medication optimisation

  • Cardiovascular risk management

Early coding helps ensure patients receive safe, structured long-term care.


2️⃣ CQC_MISDIAG_CKD β€” Possible Missed CKD Stage 3–5 Diagnosis

Identifies patients with persistently reduced kidney function who do not have a CKD stage 3–5 diagnosis recorded.

What it checks

  • Two eGFR results <60 mL/min

  • Results recorded within the last 2 years

  • Results taken more than 2 weeks apart

  • Whether the patient already has a valid CKD diagnosis or explanation recorded

What counts as complete

A patient is considered complete if they have any of the following recorded after the low eGFR results:

  • A current CKD stage 3–5 diagnosis

  • A CKD resolved code

  • A CKD stage 1–2 code (indicating recovery or improvement)

Patients without one of these will appear for review.

Why this matters

Uncoded CKD increases the risk of:

  • Incorrect medication dosing

  • Exposure to nephrotoxic drugs

  • Missed monitoring and referrals

  • Faster disease progression

Correct coding supports safer prescribing and appropriate follow-up.


πŸ“˜ Diagnostic thresholds used

Diabetes (HbA1c)
β‰₯48 mmol/mol on two occasions, more than 2 weeks apart

Chronic Kidney Disease (eGFR)
<60 mL/min on two occasions, more than 2 weeks apart


πŸ’‘ Why this matters

These indicators help practices to:

  • Identify patients with likely diabetes or CKD who are not yet coded

  • Add diagnoses where clinically appropriate

  • Ensure patients are included on the correct disease registers

  • Enable safer prescribing and monitoring

  • Improve population health data and CQC compliance


βœ… These indicators are now live

You can add them to your Recall Campaigns to help ensure patients with evidence of chronic disease are not missed and receive the care they need.

Did this answer your question?